Christopher Ward C60 Trident Lumière Limited EditionvsTissot Seastar 2000
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
17 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
4 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Christopher Ward C60 Trident Lumière Limited Edition vs Tissot Seastar 2000 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Christopher Ward C60 Trident Lumière Limited Edition is widely praised for its well-executed Light-catcher titanium case and comfortable 41mm build, with owners highlighting its excellent bezel and crown action and overall finishing quality. The spectacular Globolight lume on the dial and hands offers a bright, even glow and legibility, ultimately winning over initial reservations about the large markers. Some reviewers note that the end links can appear slightly longer than the lugs, and one owner expressed a preference for grade 5 titanium over grade 2 for improved scratch resistance. The watch is powered by a COSC-certified Sellita SW300-1 movement with a 56-hour power reserve. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Christopher Ward C60 Trident Lumière Limited Edition highly for its impressive lume and exceptional case finishing at its price point.
The watch features a unique dial that provides a good experience in both day and night conditions. One weakness is the relatively high price point of the watch, especially when compared to other divers in the market. Reviewers disagree on the significance of the watch's ultra-slim design.
Owners widely praise the Tissot Seastar 2000 for its impressive specifications at its price point, including an 80-hour power reserve, ISO 6425 certification, sapphire crystal, ceramic bezel, and 600m water resistance, with its dial quality and finishing considered superior for its class. The blue dial is frequently highlighted as particularly sharp and legible. However, the watch's substantial size and weight are consistent drawbacks; its 46mm width, 16.3mm thickness, and 52mm lug-to-lug dimension make it too large for some for everyday wear, with a rubber strap often recommended over the metal bracelet for comfort. A significant concern raised by multiple owners is the bezel's tendency to become loose and lose its click, with one reporting this on two separate watches. Accuracy figures vary, with one owner noting +1 second per day and another around +5 seconds per day.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.











