Christopher Ward C60 LympstonevsSeiko Monster SRP313J1
lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures
Measurements
Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.
C60 Lympstone
Monster SRP313J1
Diameter
42mm
42mm
Lug-to-Lug
49.3mm
n/a
Thickness
13.8mm
n/a
Water Resistance
600m
highest
200m
Power Reserve
38h
n/a
MSRP
$1,615
$450
lowest
Movement
Sellita SW200-1
Seiko 4R36
Case
5 specsCrystal & Dial
4 specsMovement
4 specsPricing
1 specsReviews
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Christopher Ward C60 Lympstone is praised for its unique matt crushed carbon fiber dial, which offers a meteor-like appearance. Owners note the excellent X1 lume that glows brightly and for a long duration, and the gunmetal PVD case is described as appearing more like brushed stainless steel with a patina than black. The watch features two large, easy-to-manipulate screw-down crowns for time setting and an internal compass bezel. Overall, owners rate the Christopher Ward C60 Lympstone highly for its distinctive dial and robust lume.
The Seiko Monster SRP313J1 is praised for its updated 4R36 movement offering hacking and hand-winding, and its bright LumiBrite lume. One owner notes their watch runs at +480 seconds per day. Another owner finds the "teeth indices" of second-generation Monsters more fitting to the "monstrous" aesthetic, considering the SRP313J1 sleeker. On balance, owners and reviewers find the Seiko Monster SRP313J1 appealing for its modern movement features and strong lume, though aesthetic preferences vary.
Similar watches
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price, microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
Also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog: alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.