Cadola Taurus ChronographvsSeiko Prospex SPEEDTIMER
lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures
Measurements
Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.
Taurus Chronograph
Prospex SPEEDTIMER
Diameter
39mm
39mm
Lug-to-Lug
47mm
45.5mm
lowest
Thickness
13.8mm
13.3mm
lowest
Water Resistance
50m
100m
highest
MSRP
$220
lowest
$725
Movement
Quartz
Seiko V192
Case
3 specsCrystal & Dial
4 specsMovement
1 specsPricing
1 specsReviews
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely find the Cadola Taurus Chronograph to be an acceptable value, though opinions on its design are mixed, with some finding the dial too busy. One owner notes the watch includes a watch winder, while another expresses concern that the watch feels cheaply made and could break easily. The 39mm case size is considered large by one owner with small wrists. Overall, owners rate the Cadola Taurus Chronograph as an acceptable value, with the primary concern being its perceived build quality.
Owners widely praise the Seiko Prospex SPEEDTIMER for its vintage-inspired design and versatility as an everyday watch. Some owners find the 39mm case size comfortable and well-suited for active use. Reviewers note the solar-powered V192 movement offers a six-month power reserve. Criticisms include the watch's thickness, which some find to be between 13-15mm, and the 24-hour subdial. The price point is a recurring point of contention, with some owners questioning the value for a solar quartz chronograph. On balance, owners and reviewers find the Seiko Prospex SPEEDTIMER a capable and attractive watch, with its design being the most frequently cited positive attribute.
The Seiko Prospex SPEEDTIMER's solar movement provides reliable power without battery replacements and accurate timekeeping, with a claimed accuracy of ±15 seconds per month. A notable trade-off is the watch's slightly thicker profile and somewhat lacking lume brightness. Reviewers disagree on whether the bezel action is smooth and clicky, with one reviewer praising it and the other not mentioning it.
Similar watches
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price, microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
Also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog: alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.