Casio EFB-730DvsDan Henry 1962

lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures

Measurements

Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.

Casio EFB-730D at true scale

EFB-730D

Dan Henry 1962 at true scale

1962

Diameter

40mm

39mm

Lug-to-Lug

47mm

45.9mm

lowest

Thickness

11mm

lowest

13.5mm

Water Resistance

100m

n/a

MSRP

$165

lowest

$280

Movement

Quartz

Quartz

Case

7 specs
Diameter
40mm
39mm
Thickness
11mm
13.5mm
Lug-to-Lug
47mm
45.9mm
Lug Width
n/a
20mm
Material
Stainless Steel
316L Stainless Steel
Finish
n/a
n/a
Water Resistance
100m
n/a

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
AR Coating
No
n/a
Dial Color
Black
White

Movement

2 specs
Caliber
n/a
n/a
Power Reserve
n/a
0h

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$165
$280
Keep your wishlist and collection together in the appExplore the app

Reviews

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Casio EFB-730D

Owners widely praise the Casio EFB-730D for its 40mm size, which is considered perfect for smaller to medium wrists and versatile for strap changes with its 20mm lug width. The subtle sunburst blue dial is noted as classy and better in person than in photos, and the overall finish is considered quite good for the price. Some owners find the constantly running central seconds hand impractical, while others appreciate its straightforward Casio quartz reliability and value around $150. One owner reported the second hand sticking on the minute hand, and another found the 47mm lug-to-lug measurement wore larger than expected. Overall, owners rate the Casio EFB-730D highly for its comfortable wearability and attractive design at the price point.

Dan Henry 1962

Owners widely praise the Dan Henry 1962 for its legibility, attractive panda dial, and value under $300. However, some find its quartz movement and chronograph functionality limited, and its design a "mash-up" that doesn't quite capture vintage inspirations. One owner found strap fitting difficult due to tight tolerances and the lume to be poor, fading quickly and hindering legibility with glowing sub-dial hands; visibility was also an issue with black hands on black sub-dials. On balance, owners rate the Dan Henry 1962 well for its value and attractive dial, despite some reservations about its quartz movement and legibility challenges.

From video reviewers

The vintage aesthetic and affordable price point are praised. The lume performance is considered weak.

Similar watches

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price, microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

DiscussionNot started

Also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog: alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.