Casio FT-500WC-5BVvsVaer Calendar Field
lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures
Measurements
Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.
FT-500WC-5BV
Calendar Field
Diameter
41.5mm
36mm
Lug-to-Lug
n/a
43mm
Thickness
12.6mm
8.4mm
lowest
Water Resistance
100m
100m
MSRP
$46
lowest
$189
Movement
Quartz
Miyota 2035
Case
5 specsCrystal & Dial
2 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsReviews
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Casio FT-500WC-5BV as an underrated, compelling purchase, frequently highlighting its exceptional value at around $21-$22. Its practical LED backlight, comfortable hook-and-loop strap, and outdoorsy analog design are consistently noted as strong points. The 41.5mm case size is described as comfortable and not overly large on the wrist. Overall, owners rate the Casio FT-500WC-5BV highly for its practicality and affordability.
The Vaer Calendar Field is widely praised for its exceptional value, featuring a clean, WWII-inspired dial, sapphire crystal, and 100m water resistance. Owners consistently highlight its thin, comfortable 36mm case with nice brushing and phenomenal dial and hand design, considering it a significant step up in case finishing compared to other quartz field watches in its price range. Some owners note the second hand does not perfectly align with markers and the lume is only serviceable, while one wishes for a brighter date window. Overall, owners rate the Vaer Calendar Field highly for its design and build quality at the price point.
Similar watches
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price, microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
Also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog: alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.