Chronotechna NanoBlackvsChronotechna SeaQuest

lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures

Measurements

Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.

Chronotechna NanoBlack at true scale

NanoBlack

Chronotechna SeaQuest at true scale

SeaQuest

Diameter

42mm

42mm

Lug-to-Lug

47.9mm

47.7mm

lowest

Thickness

11.7mm

lowest

12.4mm

Water Resistance

100m

300m

highest

Power Reserve

38h

41h

highest

Movement

Sellita SW200-1

Sellita SW200-1

Case

4 specs
Category
Field
Diver
Thickness
11.65mm
12.36mm
Lug-to-Lug
47.9mm
47.67mm
Water Resistance
100m
300m

Crystal & Dial

1 specs
Dial Color
White
Gradient Blue

Movement

1 specs
Power Reserve
38h
41h
Keep your wishlist and collection together in the appExplore the app

Reviews

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Chronotechna NanoBlack

The Chronotechna NanoBlack is noted for its pigment issues, with over 50% of the NanoBlack and VantaBlack pigments being rejected and requiring dial recalls and repainting. On balance, the Chronotechna NanoBlack is not rated well due to significant pigment and dial issues.

Chronotechna SeaQuest

Chronotechna SeaQuest owners and reviewers praise its build quality and value, with one owner finding it worth its 399 Euro price. The watch features a 42mm steel case, a Sellita SW200-1 automatic movement, and 300m water resistance. However, opinions diverge on the dial and lume; one reviewer highlights a striking blue gradient dial, while an owner criticizes the "blackest black" NanoBlack dial for being hard to read and notes iffy lume. On balance, owners rate the Chronotechna SeaQuest well for its build quality and value, despite mixed opinions on dial legibility and lume.

From video reviewers

The watch's super-black coating provides exceptional legibility due to its ultra-low reflectance. Reviewers did not identify any shared weaknesses.