Defakto EinsvsMKII Project 300

lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures

Measurements

Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.

Defakto Eins at true scale

Eins

MKII Project 300 at true scale

Project 300

Diameter

42mm

41.3mm

Lug-to-Lug

51mm

48mm

lowest

Thickness

9.8mm

lowest

13.4mm

Water Resistance

100m

300m

highest

MSRP

n/a

$1,995

Movement

ETA 2824-2

ETA 2824-2

Case

5 specs
Diameter
42mm
41.25mm
Thickness
9.8mm
13.45mm
Lug-to-Lug
51mm
48mm
Lug Width
n/a
20mm
Water Resistance
100m
300m

Crystal & Dial

1 specs
Dial Color
n/a
n/a

Movement

1 specs
Power Reserve
0h
n/a

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
n/a
$1,995
Keep your wishlist and collection together in the appExplore the app

Reviews

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Defakto Eins

The Defakto Eins is a single-handed watch with a minimalist style. One owner notes that the single hand requires adjustment to read accurately to within +/- 3 minutes. Another user prefers a 24-hour watch for its simplicity over the Defakto Eins's Mono Superluminova dial. On balance, owners find the Defakto Eins to be a minimalist single-handed watch option, though its single-hand functionality may require adjustment for precise timekeeping.

MKII Project 300

Owners widely praise the MKII Project 300 for its balanced design, with one owner noting its lume "glows like a torch." Reviewers highlight its high legibility and bold, balanced aesthetic, inspired by classic dive watches. One owner found the 41.25mm case fit their wrist perfectly. Overall, owners and reviewers rate the MKII Project 300 highly for its exceptional lume and well-proportioned dive watch design.

From video reviewers

The 39.5mm case size fits most wrists well. The watch offers 200M water resistance. Reviewers did not reach a consensus on any weaknesses or points of disagreement.