Eza 1972 DivervsNivada Grenchen Depthmaster
lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures
Measurements
Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.

1972 Diver

Depthmaster
Diameter
39.6mm
39mm
Thickness
11.9mm
lowest
13mm
Water Resistance
200m
1000m
highest
Power Reserve
41h
highest
38h
MSRP
$1,411
$1,100
lowest
Movement
Sellita SW200-1
Sellita SW200-1
Case
4 specsCrystal & Dial
2 specsMovement
1 specsPricing
1 specsReviews
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Eza 1972 Diver for its faithful vintage design and excellent value, with one owner noting it surpasses other watches in bezel action, crown comfort, thinness, and packaging, all at a significantly lower price. The watch is noted for its thin 39.6mm case and impressive accuracy, running at nearly 0 seconds per day. Some find the bezel action a bit stiff. Overall, owners rate the Eza 1972 Diver highly for its vintage aesthetic and exceptional value proposition.
The case finishing, with its mix of brushed and polished surfaces, is a notable strength. The price point of $995 USD is a point of contention, with one reviewer suggesting it may be high compared to competitors.
Owners widely praise the Nivada Grenchen Depthmaster for its terrific build quality and vintage charm, noting it looks and feels similar to the original 1960s model and features a reasonable lug-to-lug measurement. Some reviewers highlight its impressive 1000m water resistance within a compact 39mm case and eye-catching dials, with one specific collaboration lauded for its unique seconds hand and charismatic case. However, opinions are split on sizing, with some finding the 39mm case small and wearing on the smaller side, while others praise it as perfect for smaller wrists. One owner found the build quality underwhelming, suggesting alternatives, and another described the folded steel bracelet as having sharp edges. Some also note that certain numeral designs appear rushed, and a specific collaboration's rubber strap was difficult to adjust.
Similar watches
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price, microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
Also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog: alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.








