Eza 1972vsGlycine Sea Kraken
lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures
Measurements
Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.

1972

Sea Kraken
Diameter
35.8mm
39mm
Lug-to-Lug
44.3mm
n/a
Thickness
11.3mm
lowest
12.7mm
Water Resistance
30m
150m
highest
Power Reserve
40h
highest
38h
MSRP
$1,411
$715
lowest
Movement
Sellita SW200-1
Sellita SW200-1
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
6 specsMovement
4 specsPricing
1 specsReviews
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Eza 1972 for its faithful vintage re-issue design and good value, with many finding it nearly perfect and superior to comparable models. Reviewers and owners alike highlight its thin case and quality straps, while some note the 30m water resistance as a limitation for a dive watch. On balance, the consensus is that the Eza 1972 is highly regarded for its vintage aesthetic and excellent value proposition.
The Glycine Sea Kraken is widely praised for its retro design and excellent finishing for its price point. Owners highlight its crisp dial printing, elegant stainless steel bezel, and the smooth winding feel of its Sellita SW200-1 movement, with accuracy reported between +1/+2 and +6 seconds per day, though one owner noted it could lose up to 6 seconds when very active. The 39mm case size is generally considered comfortable, though some find its 48mm lug-to-lug measurement wears larger than expected. The included leather strap is frequently criticized as being of poor quality and unsuitable for a dive watch, prompting many owners to replace it. The Glycine Sea Kraken is considered an underrated watch offering great value, especially given its limited production and superior finishing compared to other Glycine models.
The Glycine Sea Kraken's value at its price point is a significant strength. Reviewers did not reach a consensus on any weaknesses.
Similar watches
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price, microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
Also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog: alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.








