Glycine Combat Sub VintagevsZENEA ULA Diver
lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures
Measurements
Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.
Combat Sub Vintage
ULA Diver
Diameter
42mm
41mm
Lug-to-Lug
n/a
48mm
Thickness
12.5mm
12mm
lowest
Water Resistance
200m
300m
highest
Power Reserve
38h
n/a
MSRP
$540
n/a
Movement
Sellita SW200-1
ETA 2824-2
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
5 specsPricing
1 specsReviews
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Glycine Combat Sub Vintage is widely praised by owners for its perfect proportions and slim profile, with one owner noting a thinness of 10.4mm. The unique, non-homage design is a significant draw. However, some owners report sub-par lume and inconsistent power reserve. One owner of a 39mm variant also noted a slightly off-color lume pip on the chapter ring. Overall, owners rate the Glycine Combat Sub Vintage highly for its wearability and distinct design at its price point.
The slim 10.5mm thickness is a consensus strength. Reviewers noted the two-tone option as an aesthetic appeal. No consensus weakness was identified.
Owners praise the Zenea Ula Diver's unique, well-made bezel and the comfort of its slide-adjust bracelet. Reviewers note its robust build and comfortable 41mm size, with one enthusiast highlighting its sapphire crystal and ceramic bezel. One owner reports zero issues with the watch. Overall, owners and reviewers rate the Zenea Ula Diver highly for its practical design and comfortable wearability at the price.
Similar watches
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price, microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
Also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog: alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.