SpecStudio
Click to inspect
Hublot Classic Fusion Aerofusion Moonphase Titanium 42mm
Ref. 547.NX.0170.LR · Moonphase
$18,800In stock
Case
- Diameter
- 42mm
- Material
- Titanium
- Finish
- Titanium
- Water resistance
- 50m
Crystal & dial
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Dial colour
- Black
Movement
- Caliber
- Hublot HUB1131
- Type
- Automatic
- Power reserve
- 48h
- Hacking
- Yes
- Hand-winding
- Yes
- Complications
- Moonphase
Design language
- Case shape
- round
- Dial style
- skeleton
- Bezel
- fixed
- Bracelet
- lug-attached
- Hands
- baton
- Moonphase
- Yes
AI-detected from the product image
Classic Fusion collection · 24 watches
11 more in this collection
The market
Market prices.
Retail$18,800
eBay listings
- HUBLOT Classic Fusion Aerofusion Moonphase | Titanium | Ref. 547.NX.0170.LR | FSPre-owned - Excellent · US$10,595
- Hublot Aerofusion Moonphase Titanium 547.NX.0170.LR 42mm Black Dial No.67700Pre-owned - Good · KR$11,531
- Hublot Classic Fusion Aerofusion Moon Phase Titanium 547.NX.0170.LR TO309150Pre-owned - Good · JP$12,050
Lowest displayed prices first.
Matched listings from our latest checks; eBay may show additional results. We may earn a commission through these links at no extra cost to you.
The connection engine
More like this.
The community take
Owners talk.
The Hublot Classic Fusion Aerofusion Moonphase Titanium 42mm is praised for its light 42mm titanium case, which contributes to a classy and stylish appearance. Owners are divided on its value, with some finding it boring and questioning its price, while others consider its stunning design and impressive finishing akin to art. Some in the community note that Hublot is only considered worthwhile at the $400 price point, and a basic ETA movement is a point of contention for some. Overall, owners are split on the Hublot Classic Fusion Aerofusion Moonphase Titanium 42mm, with opinions on its value and movement differing significantly, though its design and finishing receive praise.
Open the discussion
On real wrists
No shots yet. Show how it wears.
The paper trail
The discussion