Click to inspect
CIGA Design HUNTER
Case
- Diameter
- 43mm
- Thickness
- 12.1mm
- Lug-to-lug
- 48mm
- Lug width
- 22mm
- Material
- Stainless Steel
- Water resistance
- 30m
Crystal & dial
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Dial colour
- Carbon
Movement
- Caliber
- CIGA Design CD-07
- Type
- Automatic
- Jewels
- 24
- Hacking
- No
- Hand-winding
- No
- Complications
- Time only
Design language
- Case shape
- rectangular
- Dial style
- skeleton
- Bezel
- fixed
- Bracelet
- lug-attached
- Hands
- baton
AI-detected from the product image
4 colorways
The living market
This one moves.
It is on r/Watchexchange and WatchUSeek right now, and finding it means searching both by hand. Not appraisals or offers.
Retail$499
1 for sale right now, and 2 closed in the last 30 days.
- The weekly trend, on a real time scale
- How long one takes to sell, from the listings that closed
- The listing itself, priced and linked
The connection engine
More like this.
The community take
Owners talk.
The CIGA Design HUNTER is widely seen as a visually impressive skeleton watch that offers an expensive aesthetic for its price. Owners find the CIGA Design HUNTER weighty but fun, and reviewers highlight its well-executed skeletonization and excellent case integration. However, legibility is a common concern, with one owner noting minimal anti-reflective coating and another pointing out the hands' lume application is lacking. The movement is described as loud by one reviewer, and a significant durability issue was reported by an owner whose watch stopped ticking within a day. The CIGA Design HUNTER features a Grade 5 titanium case with crisp finishing. Overall, owners and reviewers appreciate the CIGA Design HUNTER for its striking skeletonized design and premium case finishing at an accessible price point, though concerns exist regarding legibility and movement noise.
Open the discussion
On video
On real wrists
No shots yet. Show how it wears.
The paper trail
Cross-shops
Popular comparisons.
The matchups people make with the CIGA Design HUNTER most — open one to see it side by side.
The discussion