Redux COURG: Zero-Hour
$499Sold out
Case
- Diameter
- 39mm
- Thickness
- 13.7mm
- Lug-to-lug
- 46.6mm
- Lug width
- 20mm
- Material
- Titanium
- Water resistance
- 200m
Crystal & dial
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Dial colour
- Black
Movement
- Caliber
- Seiko NH35
- Type
- Automatic
- Power reserve
- 41h
Seiko
Seiko's third-party supply version of the 4R35, sold to external watch brands and modders worldwide. Adds hacking and hand-winding over the 7S26 it effectively replaced. The NH35 has become the default automatic movement for watch modding and microbrand watches, thanks to its low cost, reliability, and wide availability of compatible parts including dials, hands, and cases in the Seiko-compatible format.
Design language
- Case shape
- round
- Dial style
- matte
- Bezel
- rotating
- Bracelet
- fabric
- Hands
- baton
AI-detected from the product image
The market
Market prices.
Retail$499
The forum market
Follow the asking price.
Active listings0Across watch forums
Closed · 90d0Asking-price history
No forum listings tracked for this watch yet.
The connection engine
More like this.
The community take
Owners talk.
I need to carefully apply the rules here. Let me identify the critical issues: **MOVEMENT CONTRADICTION (Rule: GROUND-TRUTH SPECS):** - Ground truth: Seiko NH35 - Source 3 states: "Seiko NH53A movement" - This contradicts the ground truth. Per instructions, I must DROP any clause stating a movement that contradicts the ground-truth specs. **VARIANT/SIBLING DISCIPLINE (VARIANT DISCIPLINE rule):** - Source 1 mentions "COURG: Zero-Hour" with "matte blue-gray titanium bezel" - Source 3 mentions "COURG" with bezel play issues - Source 5 mentions "Grade 5 Ti COURG" with "B" dial and date - These appear to be different configurations/variants of a "COURG" line within Redux - The ground truth gives me 39mm, NH35, 200m WR, but does NOT specify dial type, date window, or specific bezel finish - Since I cannot confirm which variant
Open the discussion
On real wrists
No shots yet. Show how it wears.
The paper trail
The discussion