Longines Conquest 34mm
Ref. L3.460.4.02.6 · Sport
$1,500Stock unknown
Case
- Diameter
- 34mm
- Material
- Stainless Steel
- Caseback
- Solid
Crystal & dial
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Dial colour
- Lavender mauve sandblasted
- Indices
- Applied
Movement
- Type
- Quartz
- Complications
- Date
Design language
- Case shape
- round
- Dial style
- standard
- Bezel
- smooth_polished
- Bracelet
- metal_oyster
AI-detected from the product image
Conquest collection · 19 watches
6 more in this collection
6 colorways
The market
Market prices.
Retail$1,500
eBay listings
- Longines Conquest - L3.460.4.12.6New with box and papers · IT$1,495
- Longines Conquest 34 MM Mint Blue Sandblasted Dial Quartz Watch L34604926New with box and papers · AE$1,500
- Longines Conquest 34 MM Sunray Green Dial Quartz Watch L34604096New with box and papers · AE$1,500
Lowest displayed prices first.
Matched listings from our latest checks; eBay may show additional results. We may earn a commission through these links at no extra cost to you.
Retail stock & market context
Longines on the secondhand market
+8.5%
2026 so far · +3.2% to +16.0% · 44 matched watches
In line with the index
Year-by-year readings →The connection engine
More like this.
The community take
Owners talk.
Owners widely praise the Longines Conquest 34mm for its versatile sizing, with many finding it a perfect fit for smaller wrists and appreciating its sporty presence. The pastel and taupe dial options are frequently highlighted as beautiful and dynamic, with one owner describing the pistachio dial as a nice find. The watch's clean dial, raised indices, and elegant aesthetics are also noted strengths. Some owners are split on whether the 34mm size appears masculine or feminine, though many find it suits their frames well. One owner notes the crown can be "fiddly" to pull out. Overall, owners rate the Longines Conquest 34mm highly for its attractive dial colors and comfortable, versatile sizing on smaller wrists.
Open the discussion
On real wrists
No shots yet. Show how it wears.
The paper trail
The discussion