Echo/Neutra 1956 ChronovsDan Henry 1962

lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures

Measurements

Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.

Echo/Neutra 1956 Chrono at true scale

1956 Chrono

Dan Henry 1962 at true scale

1962

Diameter

40mm

39mm

Lug-to-Lug

46mm

45.9mm

lowest

Thickness

14.1mm

13.5mm

lowest

Water Resistance

100m

n/a

Power Reserve

48h

n/a

MSRP

$2,060

$280

lowest

Movement

Sellita SW510

Quartz

Case

7 specs
Diameter
40mm
39mm
Thickness
14.1mm
13.5mm
Lug-to-Lug
46mm
45.9mm
Lug Width
n/a
20mm
Finish
Brushed + Polished
n/a
Water Resistance
100m
n/a
Caseback
Solid screw-down
n/a

Crystal & Dial

4 specs
Crystal Shape
Ultra-domed
n/a
AR Coating
Underside
n/a
Dial Color
Black
White
Lume
Superluminova Old Radium
None

Movement

6 specs
Caliber
Sellita SW510
n/a
Type
Manual
Quartz
Beat Rate
28,800 vph
0 vph
Power Reserve
48h
0h
Jewels
23
0
Complications
Chronograph
None

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$2,060
$280
Keep your wishlist and collection together in the appExplore the app

Reviews

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Echo/Neutra 1956 Chrono

Owners widely praise the Echo/Neutra 1956 Chrono for its gorgeous looks, good build quality, and value for the price, with many finding it a top watch in their collection. The dial and ceramic bezel are described as flawless, and the case features well-executed bevels. Some owners note difficulty reading the dial in dull lighting, and one owner reported accuracy of over +30 seconds per day. The leather strap may run small. Overall, owners rate the Echo/Neutra 1956 Chrono highly for its attractive design and solid build quality at its price point.

From video reviewers

The ceramic telemeter bezel is a noted strength. The pressure crown may limit water resistance compared to screw-down crowns. Reviewers disagree on the value proposition compared to alternatives.

Dan Henry 1962

Owners widely praise the Dan Henry 1962 for its legibility, attractive panda dial, and value under $300. However, some find its quartz movement and chronograph functionality limited, and its design a "mash-up" that doesn't quite capture vintage inspirations. One owner found strap fitting difficult due to tight tolerances and the lume to be poor, fading quickly and hindering legibility with glowing sub-dial hands; visibility was also an issue with black hands on black sub-dials. On balance, owners rate the Dan Henry 1962 well for its value and attractive dial, despite some reservations about its quartz movement and legibility challenges.

From video reviewers

The vintage aesthetic and affordable price point are praised. The lume performance is considered weak.

Similar watches

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price, microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

DiscussionNot started

Also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog: alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.