Dan Henry 1939vsDan Henry 1962

lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures

Measurements

Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.

Dan Henry 1939 at true scale

1939

Dan Henry 1962 at true scale

1962

Diameter

41mm

39mm

Lug-to-Lug

49.2mm

45.9mm

lowest

Thickness

13.9mm

13.5mm

lowest

MSRP

$300

$280

lowest

Movement

Quartz

Quartz

Case

4 specs
Diameter
41mm
39mm
Thickness
13.9mm
13.5mm
Lug-to-Lug
49.2mm
45.9mm
Lug Width
22mm
20mm

Crystal & Dial

1 specs
Dial Color
Standard
White

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$300
$280
Keep your wishlist and collection together in the appExplore the app

Reviews

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Dan Henry 1939

Owners widely praise the Dan Henry 1939 for its striking, detailed, and art-like design, often noting its resemblance to vintage models and its exceptional value at $220. Specific highlights include the gorgeous domed crystal, the multi-layered dial with glossy black background and gold raised markers, and the solid clicking feel of its chronograph buttons. The watch is described as having beautiful build quality, being robust and durable, and retaining its sturdiness even after years of daily wear. Some owners express disappointment that it uses a quartz movement, and one found it surprisingly heavy. Overall, owners rate the Dan Henry 1939 highly for its stunning vintage-inspired design and robust build quality at an accessible price point.

From video reviewers

The dial finishing and classic aesthetic are consistently praised. The lack of lume is a significant drawback for legibility in low light.

Dan Henry 1962

Owners widely praise the Dan Henry 1962 for its legibility, attractive panda dial, and value under $300. However, some find its quartz movement and chronograph functionality limited, and its design a "mash-up" that doesn't quite capture vintage inspirations. One owner found strap fitting difficult due to tight tolerances and the lume to be poor, fading quickly and hindering legibility with glowing sub-dial hands; visibility was also an issue with black hands on black sub-dials. On balance, owners rate the Dan Henry 1962 well for its value and attractive dial, despite some reservations about its quartz movement and legibility challenges.

From video reviewers

The vintage aesthetic and affordable price point are praised. The lume performance is considered weak.

Similar watches

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price, microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

DiscussionNot started

Also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog: alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.