Jack Mason Strat-o-timer GMTvsRolex Explorer II
lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures
Measurements
Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.

Strat-o-timer GMT

Explorer II
Diameter
42mm
42mm
Lug-to-Lug
49mm
n/a
Thickness
13.2mm
n/a
Water Resistance
200m
highest
100m
Power Reserve
42h
70h
highest
MSRP
$1,149
lowest
$10,600
Movement
Miyota 9075
3285
Case
6 specsCrystal & Dial
4 specsMovement
7 specsPricing
1 specsReviews
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Jack Mason Strat-o-timer GMT for its exceptional value and traveler GMT functionality, citing the Miyota 9075 movement and impressive fit and finish, including screw-in bracelet pins, on-the-fly adjustment, sapphire crystal front and back, and a screw-down crown. The 7-link bracelet is frequently highlighted as a standout feature, with one owner calling it the best they have worn. Some reviewers note "chubby" hour markers and a bezel insert that one owner perceived as plastic, though another stated it is sapphire. Overall, owners rate the Jack Mason Strat-o-timer GMT highly for its impressive build quality and traveler GMT complication at its price point.
The Miyota 9075 true GMT movement is a consensus strength. The lume on the hands, dial, and bezel is also a shared positive feature. Reviewers did not reach a consensus on any weaknesses or points of disagreement.
Owners widely praise the Rolex Explorer II for its high-contrast, legible polar dial with matte, textured finishing and its understated, classic, toolish aesthetic. Its clean lume, legibility, and ease of reading are also frequently noted. Some owners find the bracelet incredibly comfortable. Accuracy is reported as excellent, with one owner noting +/- 1 second per day. The 42mm case size is a point of contention, with some finding it too large and others appreciating its "big boy watch" suitability for everyday wear. The bezel is noted as easily scratched, and some criticize the lack of a Glidelock clasp. One owner dislikes the magnified date window for being difficult to read at angles. Overall, owners rate the Rolex Explorer II highly for its legible dial and comfortable bracelet, despite some debate over its 42mm size.
The fixed 24-hour bezel and independent GMT hand provide practical dual-time functionality. The 42mm Oystersteel case is noted for versatile wearability. Reviewers disagree on the watch's sizing, with some finding it awkward and others stating it wears well.
Similar watches
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price, microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
Also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog: alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









